To Lease or Own Commercial Property?
A property user has the option of buying or leasing whatever the type of property it is. Should you buy the house you live in or rent one from someone else? In residential real estate with few exceptions, there is an overwhelming response to own and the benefits weigh heavily toward property ownership. But when it comes to property ownership by a business for commercial use, the answer sometimes may be to lease instead.
Real estate investors who enter into a long-term lease instead of buying a property are making a decision with implications that can have an effect on both financial and tax positions. The important difference of the long-term lease from a straight purchase (outright or with a loan) is borrowing (leasing) the property itself for financial benefit. Payments for the use of real estate can be beneficial, with lease payments being fully deductible expenses.
Sometimes the choice of owning is not an option and the property can only be leased not purchased. During times when money is not available except at very high rates, a lease may be the only choice. Another situation where only leases are practical would be with the best possible location in a large city, where institutional owners hold the land on a long-term basis.
Examples of property users who must make the decision to own or buy for their business:
Property Used in Trade or Business
In starting a new business, the owner of that enterprise has the option of buying or leasing the business location. In the beginning, this choice has little meaning to most. The owner most often will lease a business location, preserving capital for operation of the business. Capital is always critical in early operations and seldom is there enough reserves with a new business to purchase real estate.
A Later Choice
The choice of buying or leasing remains as an alternative even later. After some years and much success, the owner may wish to expand, change locations, or just have a business location that is “tailored” to the specific needs of his operation. So, the business owner buys a property with a small down payment. He borrows and builds a building, which is perfect for present and future needs of the business. In addition to the best location, there are other benefits that might help to make the decision to purchase the property. These are:
Now, in addition to security and self-image, the owner has all of the elements of a good “leveraged” investment: Low down payment, large loan and depreciation of the improvements. The cost may have been fairly small. After a minimum down payment, the payments on the loan may not have been too different from the previous monthly lease payments.
The Next Buyer
After time the situation may change again. After owning and using the property for ten or fifteen years, this owner might be approached by a broker with a buyer for a good property to own as a passive investment. The investor prefers a commercial building with a good tenant and a long-term lease. The broker suggested a purchase of an existing business property from the present owner who might then lease back the property. The big change for the business owner happened over the years. Because of inflation in those years of ownership and the annual reduction of the mortgage with the loan payments, he has built an enormous equity in the property. The original down payment has now grown to a huge equity – maybe hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
The New Benefits
The purchase of the property was an excellent move for the business owner. Now, with the passage of time, his position has changed. When discussing this with his Real Estate Investment Counselor and CPA, the following list of benefits for the sale of the property, then a leaseback, were developed.
These benefits were all to the liking of the business owner. The only drawback was the tax to be paid on the gain in value. After his CPA computed the actual amount, the tax was minimal compared to the benefits, so the sale, then leaseback was completed.
A sale-leaseback scenario often accomplishes more for the seller than getting money by borrowing on the property. The seller is entitled to deduct the entire rental payment as a business expense. On a loan, only the interest can be deducted. So, the sale-leaseback, in effect, makes the cost of the land depreciable. With a mortgage, the mortgagor can neither depreciate the land nor can the portion of the loan payment that amortizes the land (loan reduction) be deducted.
Since the payments on rent are similar to principal and interest payments on a loan, this means that all of the monthly payment (rent) is put on a tax-deductible basis. This may more than compensate for the loss of the depreciation deduction, which was only on the improvements.